Home > Social Media > Super Original Thinking is Required to Topple Facebook

Super Original Thinking is Required to Topple Facebook

Super Radical Thinking is Required to Topple Facebook

Market research, social engineering and a little bit of luck seemed to produce a spate of so-called “boy bands” in the late 1990s. It was a radical, if not unpalatable idea, that hit artists could be fabricated rather than discovered.

It became a formula that underscores how much closer the entertainment community is to social science than it is to art.  It wasn’t a new concept, but it was the one that turned heads the most, since a time when Levitttown first placed that oh, so perfect tree.

The Truman Show, Minority Report, the Matrix – take your pick, or perhaps take your pill, but this is our world online.  It’s given to us in the name of relevancy because your friends that liked this post, also liked this post.

Marketers Mindlessly Chasing Cool

In a fleeting moment during one day of chaos, where today it seems everyone “positions” themselves as an expert, I had the notion that no one in business has all the answers.  We’re all just trying to figure it out, profitably, of course.  And if we don’t lose our way chasing the next cool.

In this liberty of an abstract context, I’d re-introduce Ello and the new social network’s noble concept that there’s a better model than advertising.  If the mass of headlines the network earned for a weekend, and maybe two, is any indication, there’s a hopefulness, especially among the Technorati over the potential for a replacement.

Yet, the reality is, it’s very difficult to replace, replicate or transition a billion people.  On the other hand, the masses can be unpredictable, especially in social moments of uncertainty.

What is certain on Facebook is that whatever remaining sentiment of organic appeal is left – the ability for content to move around the web on the merit of its very idea – is eroding in favor of the highest bidder. Virality, or appearance of virality, can be fabricated for a price.

Rethinking How Advertising is Bought and Sold

Ello is thinking outside the advertising model, which is interesting, but what’s also interesting is tinkering with the model.  Typically, those that sell advertising and those that advertise, do not have goals in alignment.  To some degree, pay-per-click, the standard of digital advertising has changed that a bit, but it’s far from perfect.

What if we radicalized this further – and aligned the goals of both organizations:  The advertising medium only gets paid when the advertiser gets paid. A cut of sales, or perhaps a slice of revenue for the especially bold (or desperate), the advertising medium is part financier, and part investor, but goals are nested.

It’s crazy right?  What if someone big, but not too big, started tinkering around with a model like this?  Someone like Yahoo, with plenty of online real estate, a penchant for radical, and some social-esque lines of business like Tumblr.

There’s a million reasons why it won’t work.  Can’t work.  Will never work.  But it’s that sort of radical thinking that’s going to be required to topple Facebook from its top seed. Perhaps then, we’ll really have something worth fabricating.

Photo credit: Flickr via Creative Commons; CC BY 2.0

If you enjoyed this post, you might also like:
Frequency Hop: The Social Conversation Fragments

You may also like
Survey shows people follow brands on social media to stay informed about new products and services
Youth will be served: 3 Signs B2B needs to revamp social media marketing
The Basic Benefits and Drawbacks of Owned, Shared, Earned, and Paid Media
Pragmatic Marketing and PR Predictions for 2020
30 Pragmatic Marketing and PR Predictions for 2020
Read previous post:
Study: Effective Content Marketing Has One Element

Walk with me for a moment – to about 30 years ago.  The setting is the 1980s sitcom Growing Pains...