Sword and the Script

Why Content Marketing is the New Branding

content marketing

by Frank Strong

Note:  a variation of this post first appeared as a guest post on Copyblogger; leave a comment if you’d be interested in having me write a guest post for you! 

>>>Branding isn’t your company name.

It’s not a tag line. It’s not a logo.

Branding is creating a perception.  It gets new customers over the sales hurdle of education.  It renews loyalty with existing customers. It creates envy among the competition.

When marketers ask, “How do we want to brand this product?” what they’re really asking is how they want their audience to think about that product once it comes to market.

A brand is a promise. It’s an expectation of an experience.

The company and tag line and logo and brand colors only exist to call that experience to mind; they do not create it.

Brands can meet that expectation, exceed that expectation … or in the worst cases, fall short of that expectation.  In crisis, brands can lose credibility in a heartbeat; but how brands react to crisis often means more in the long run than the crisis itself.

Volvo’s name is synonymous with safety, which makes it the quintessential consumer example.

Cisco’s “Human Network” stands out among business-to-business brands.

Cisco makes products that make it possible for people to be connected, no matter how far apart they may be, geographically. ~Forbes

The Red Cross is a bellwether among nonprofits, with a brand that literally means help is on the way in times of crisis.

The very essence of brands doesn’t lie within your brand colors or site design, even though those are important.

The essence of a brand lies within its meaning. And words have meaning. Words matter.

Volvo’s meaning wasn’t derived from its logo, or even its product design, but by the constant stream of product reviews that published the data on crash tests year-in and year-out.

The brand was built, over time, by third-party validation communicated through third-party content. What other people said about Volvo created the meaning of that brand. The advertising Volvo did just reinforced that meaning.

The rise of user-generated content

Google’s CEO, Eric Schmidt, is now famous for having said,

Every two days now we create as much information as we did from the dawn of civilization up until 2003.

As marketers, we try to convince customers and prospects to generate content about our brands. In other words, to talk about us. To create a Volvo-like experience where the meaning of our brand comes from how others perceive us.

How do we inspire people to generate content? To talk about us on Facebook and Twitter, to increase our audience?

Increasingly, we inspire our customers with brand experiences and by publishing our own content.

The uninitiated customer is no more inclined to mention a brand than talk to the shy person tucked quietly in the corner at a cocktail party. If we want our customers to engage us, or our products and services, we have to contribute to the conversation.

Content is currency 

Content, as Brian Solis says, is currency, bartered in exchange for someone’s attention.

Content is currency — something we trade for our audience’s attention.

That currency becomes more valuable every time it’s shared by someone other than ourselves.

Those shares might be validation. There might be debate. There might be disagreement. There might even be a trough of disillusionment.

It’s our job to create content worth sharing. How it’s shared isn’t up to us.

Our job is to figure out what types of content are most valuable to your audience — and most likely to be shared. And then to gather the resources to produce the best content you possibly can.

‘No Comment’ is a failure

Every smart crisis communications professional knows that “no comment” creates a vacuum where everyone — except the person or organization in crisis — will be able to shape the conversation.

This applies in content marketing, too. We can commit to an active role, by publishing content worth talking about … or we can abstain and miss the opportunity.

Enjoy this post?  You might also like:
Social media: you get what you give

Be Sociable, Share!

Posted In: Marketing
Tags: ,

Be Sociable, Share!
Leave a Comment

 @Frank_Strong , what a fantastic article! I especially love when you say that a brand is a promise, an expectation in experience.


So many people limit the concept to a logo or a slogan! We all know that it's not possible anymore. If you want to be successful, you now have to create a community of advocates. You have to make your audience part of the "dream".  


Strong post (no pun intended!). I'm finding that clients and my industry colleagues are coming into a fuller understanding of what goes into a brand.  I've not had the "tagline equivalency" conversation in awhile and I agree that the idea of rich, ubiquitous content and 360-degree marketing is responsible for this. To @soulati's comment on who controls branding:  it's an open question and tug-of-war betwen departments will kill the brand effort entorely.  I believe the changes in the industry will spur a good bit of restructuring inside larger organizations and an expansion of required skills for individuals in smaller organizations. 


 @cendrinemedia  @Frank_Strong Every time I read a very good piece of content on branding I cannot help but imagine what others say when they talk about a brand. Apple, Nike, Amazon, Coke. Being at the helm of my own company, I keep that in mind. With my every action, I say to myself is this what I would want to hear about my company. Is this the kind of perception I want to give Then I realize the perception is created, and then it is up to us to live up to those expectations. 

Frank_Strong moderator

 @cnahil There's definitely some merit to the idea of restructuring.  I'd like to think what we are seeing in marketing today is similar to what Hammer & Champy said bout business in Re-engineering the Corporation in 1993. Thanks for the comment!

Frank_Strong moderator

 @Soulati | B2B Social Media Marketing Ah, here we go again!  If you agree with my premise, I'd rephrase the question:  who should handle content?  Yes, PR should handle content.  I'm a PR pro, that's what I believe.  However, I'm also a PR pro that believes in calls to action, measurement and the impact on sales -- it's finding the right mix of marketing and editorial.  No function can do this better than PR.  The rest of them don't know what they don't know. IMHO.   :-) 

Frank_Strong moderator

 @TomGeorge  Cheers Tom, it's really amazing to see how far this has come.  Coke already has a strong brand, right?  One of the most recognizable brands in the world.  Yet they've transformed their website -- recently -- into a magazine of sorts. 

Frank_Strong moderator

 @Soulati | B2B Social Media Marketing Gosh, no, not at all!   It's a likely debate that you and I have both seen before.  And please do...challenge me all you like.  My thoughts here are just one guy's viewpoint.  :-)


  1. [...] Why Content Marketing is the New Branding - Branding isn’t your company name. It’s not a tag line. It’s not a logo. Branding is creating a perception.  It gets new customers over the sales hurdle of education. [...]

  2. […] it themselves, without a dependency on traditional media. Frank Strong, in a post titled ‘Why Content Marketing is the new Branding‘, rightly states that content is currency. It not only builds perception, but enables us to […]

  3. […] and North Social. He’s also worked for PR agencies big and small. Frank often writes about content marketing in a branding (calling it the ‘new’ branding) or PR context. As an experienced practitioner he also knows about running content marketing […]