Social media seems to withstand more scrutiny than other marketing channels. That was a great question I heard today at the PR News Social Media Measurement conference.
Is it true? Yes, I think it is.
General Motors spent $4.2 billion on advertising last year. They spent $10 million on Facebook ads, which they later pulled for lack of effectiveness. Sure Facebook is social, but paid media is still paid media, and millions barely earn a hash mark on billion dollar budget graph. So what do they spend on earned or shared media? I’d bet my paycheck it’s not even close to their previous spend on Facebook ads.
It’s one example, but it’s an illustrative example, and I’ve seen enough anecdotal evidence to make a not-so-bold assertion that earned and shared spending pale in comparison. Yet these mediums get more scrutiny when it comes to budgets.
What’s the ROI of social media? That’s the hard question proposed for a measly few dollars to spend on social. Can it be answered? Of course it can, with time and patience. Social media like PR is a marathon, not a sprint. Companies must invest time in engagement and relationship building for long term returns – and those that do – I can tell you from experience will see twice the conversion rate…if they are tracking where, when and how customers are engaging content.
Is the scrutiny social media receives is disproportionate to the spend? Yes. At the conference today the general consensus was marketing, generally, did not make the same business case demands of TV ads, billboards, display placements. So why does social media get the hard treatment?
1. It’s new. Actually social media is not new, but companies have tip-toed into the space so reluctantly, that planning, best practices, and measurement might as well have the perception of newness. It’s far easier to go with Big Blue rather than assume the personal, and organizational risk, of straying from the course.
2. Old habits die hard. People are inherently programmed to resist change. Unfamiliarity breeds uncertainty and uncertainty is uncomfortable. Blessed are those that are comfortable with change, because it’s far easier to take the path more traveled, to do what we have always done, because that’s what’s been done before.
3. Instant gratification. Microwaves set us up for impatience. A couple decades ago we could get instant oatmeal in a matter of seconds. For those that can’t remember boiling water for a hot serving of oatmeal, expectations have only risen. We demand instant gratification on-demand: we bank instantly online, we can purchase products instantly, we can date, find events, nearly anything we want can be found instantly online and so we’ve become more and more conditioned for instant gratification. Generally, social media doesn’t work that way, any more than walking into a physical networking event and passing off a business card will lead to an instant sale.
Social media indeed gets more scrutiny, though logically, and by comparative budget analysis, it should not. Be patient, invest wisely and slowly but surely scale your efforts. If your organization is going to spend vast amount on advertising, it is well worth the time and money to put some serious effort into social media. After all, you get what you put into it.
If you enjoyed this post you might also like:
Marketing Persona: profile of a social SMB
Your analogy to the microwave is spot on. We have become such an instant gratification society (I am referring to the baby boomers forward) that we don't appreciate the terms of investing for the long term. This is obvious in our personal debt, dissolution of marriages, frequency of job changes etc. So I certainly understand and agree with your premise that many are not willing to make the investment or commit to something that won't show immediate results.
I add only, how are we, as the instant gratification generations, doing with our on-demand system? I am sure we will hear all about it tonight on the debate ;). Thoughtful post.
Frank - great insight. Ad Age ran an article a few months back showing that something like 70% of traditional media marketing isn't measured for profitability, so I think that the measurability of social media combined with the investment necessary to succeed at scale makes it far more scrutinized. Nice article!
I spoke to a travel agency worker about using SM to grow their biz.
They were dismissive at first. Then when they saw my large following - and heard that yes, it works - they sat up straight and listened.
Awesome reasons here...the microwave society is a killer, and it's why many laugh off social media.
Work it daily though and you see it's just another channel through which you can build relationships with people.
Thanks for sharing!
@annelizhannan Cheers Anneliz, I'm partial to how similar concepts transcend the subject at hand. What I mean is your reference to relationships, debt, etc. It's so true. Perhaps that's an external benchmark.
@leaderswest Ah, very nice, I will search for that article. I spent considerable time searching for more numbers to include in this post.
@RyanBiddulph Couldn't agree more, Ryan, thanks for stopping by!